Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 13 results ...

AbouRizk, S M and Dozzi, S P (1993) Application of Computer Simulation in Resolving Construction Disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 355–73.

Barnes, W C (1993) Microcomputers in Management of Construction Operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 403–12.

Bernold, L E and Salim, M (1993) Placement‐Oriented Design and Delivery of Concrete Reinforcement. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 323–35.

Carr, R I (1993) Cost, Schedule, and Time Variances and Integration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 245–65.

East, E W and Kim, S (1993) Standardizing Scheduling Data Exchange. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 215–25.

Ioannou, P G and Liu, L Y (1993) Advanced Construction Technology System—ACTS. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 288–306.

McCullouch, B G and Gunn, P (1993) Construction Field Data Acquisition with Pen‐Based Computers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 374–84.

Miyatake, Y and Kangari, R (1993) Experiencing Computer Integrated Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 307–22.

Russell, A D (1993) Computerized Daily Site Reporting. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 385–402.

Russell, A D and Wong, W C M (1993) New Generation of Planning Structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 196–214.

Tommelein, I D and Zouein, P P (1993) Interactive Dynamic Layout Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 266–87.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction sites; Temporary structures; Land usage; Resource allocation; Construction planning; Models; Scheduling;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:2(266)
  • Abstract:
    The layout of temporary facilities on a construction site necessarily changes over time, so the term dynamic layout is used to describe a sequence of layouts spanning the entire duration of construction of a project. Many layout changes are dictated by the construction schedule. In the MovePlan model, which is presented here, the activity schedule is therefore augmented with data needed to construct layouts, i.e., resources required to perform activities, and their dimensions. This augmented schedule can drive the dynamic layout process, including the positioning of temporary facilities on site and the movement of materials and equipment. Conservative modeling assumptions were made in order to keep computational costs low, so that the MovePlan implementation would run on a microcomputer and thus be readily field‐usable. The MovePlan prototype system provides a graphical interactive interface with underlying consistency maintenance mechanisms. MovePlan enables users to model approximate site space needs during project scheduling and to create layouts for different stages of construction. Several strategies for creating layouts are described. MovePlan's output can be further refined by adding geometric detail and using more sophisticated graphical packages for detailed process planning. MovePlan can also be integrated with off‐the‐shelf project‐management software.

Vanegas, J A, Bravo, E B and Halpin, D W (1993) Simulation Technologies for Planning Heavy Construction Processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 336–54.

Yates, J K (1993) Construction Decision Support System for Delay Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(02), 226–44.